Had another bad day on the RNG (see below)
and its now come down to this.
Its how I feel sometimes.
as you say
So many scripts ...
So many ideas ...
So many robots ...
So many people ...
So many computers ...
and just continue to give money to the casinos.
The question is:
How to beat a system that gives you $ 36 and $ 37 llhe strip?
The result will always be - $ 1.
And if we use martingale always resets the result: LOST ALL MY BANKING NEW! OH MY GOD NO MORE ... AGUENDO
Any system or method that uses a progression, will always fail to beat roulette, especially against RNG.
Flat-betting on the inside numbers provides the best opportunity for winning, but you have to determine the universal cold number "sweet spot" after X number of spins, then bet on a qualifying group of numbers.
The universal sweet spot for most live casinos is between 34 - 37 spins. For example, the "sweet spot" for Dublinbet is 34 spins.
Interestingly, the "sweet spot" for BetVoyager is also 34.
I agree, martingale leads only to lose our entire bankroll.
You are using this technique to wait 34 spins and bet on a group of numbers?
How do you choose these numbers to bet?
Bet all the same value?
You're making this way?
When playing roulette, we must think about accuracy.
If a system / method is developed and it can only have a chance of winning by using a progression, then you can safely draw the conclusion that there is something seriously wrong with that system / method.
Here's a thought:
If you spin the roulette wheel say 34 times, and there are ...
13 numbers, or
14 numbers, or
15 numbers, or
16 numbers ...
that haven't hit, what are the stats that a number will hit at ...
spin 35, or
spin 36, or
spin 37 ?
Maybe 61% of the time?
This method works for me and I'm always experimenting to improve it.
The best parameters for me, so far, are ...
- See if the casino qualifies for the 34-spins "sweet spot"
because the sweet spot works in partnership with the
13-, 14-, 15-, 16-number combinations so that you can
generate potential profits of ...
$36 - $13 = $23
$36 - $14 = $22
$36 - $15 = $21
$36 - $16 = $20
- qualifying group of non-hit numbers: 13 numbers,
or 14 numbers, or 15 numbers, or 16 numbers ...
- Bet 1 unit on each unhit number in each group.
Example $1 bets: $13, $14, $15, $16
- playing in batches of 20 minutes for each session
which works out to be about 37 spins at live casino
- Maximum multi-batch session: 1hr (20+20+20)
- Exit casino when in profit, then if you so wish,
play other sessions later in the day
No system / method is perfect, but I haven't seen a
better one after reading through many forums over
The truth is that, even if you develop a system that
consistently wins in only
short bursts of play,
then you have a winner because your system / method
is based on the concept of accuracy. All you need to
do is play at many casinos for short periods of time.